Corporate Lawyer

Commercial property lawyer: possession has to be restored in case the Ex Parte decree ultimately had been set aside.

By team of Advocate Retainer May 29, 2019 - 06:00

Commercial property lawyer: possession has to be restored in case the Ex Parte decree ultimately had been set aside.

Supreme Court of India Justice Mohan M Shantanagoudar In the case titled as "Omprakash Ram vs State of Bihar" the question falling consideration b...

Read more

Corporate commercial and property lawyer: after dismissal of suit for specific performance the court without pleadings in the plaint cannot grant the decree for recovery of the payments made by the purchaser.

By team of Advocate Retainer May 29, 2019 - 01:30

Corporate commercial and property lawyer: after dismissal of suit for specific performance the court without pleadings in the plaint cannot grant the decree for recovery of the payments made by the purchaser.

Supreme Court of India In case suit for specific performance fails of the buyer, then, the court cannot pass decree of recovery of money, without o...

Read more

Rent control landlord tenant dispute commercial lawyer: the tenant was granted relief by directing the tenant to repair the building at his own cost; eviction petition on ground of Dilapidated building dismissed.

By team of Advocate Retainer May 27, 2019 - 07:00

Rent control landlord tenant dispute commercial lawyer: the tenant was granted relief by directing the tenant to repair the building at his own cost; eviction petition on ground of Dilapidated building dismissed.

Supreme Court of India Justice M R Shah The rent control eviction petition filed on ground of Dilapidated building was dismissed by the Supreme C...

Read more

PROPERTY COMMERCIAL DISPUTE LAWYER: CANCELLATION OF ALLOTMENT OF PLOT TO MIGRANT REVERSED; PLOT ALLOTED.

By team of Advocate Retainer May 27, 2019 - 00:30

PROPERTY COMMERCIAL DISPUTE LAWYER: CANCELLATION OF ALLOTMENT OF PLOT TO MIGRANT REVERSED; PLOT ALLOTED.

Supreme Court of India Justice M R Shah In the case titled as "Gurdev Singh and others Versus Union of India and others" the issue falling cons...

Read more

FILM EXHIBITION: DUTY OF STATE TO PROTECT PROPERTY OF CINEMA OWNERS, the state cannot restrict the exhibition, Citing law and order problem.

By team of Advocate Retainer May 25, 2019 - 14:00

FILM EXHIBITION: DUTY OF STATE TO PROTECT PROPERTY OF CINEMA OWNERS, the state cannot restrict the exhibition, Citing law and order problem.

Supreme Court of India Justice D Y Chandrachud The issue of safety of property of cinema owners and also the safety of the viewers was in issue be...

Read more

CHEQUE DISHONOUR SEC 138 NI ACT: The accused cannot be insisted to lead the negative evidence; Accused was acquitted.

By team of Advocate Retainer May 25, 2019 - 08:30

CHEQUE DISHONOUR SEC 138 NI ACT: The accused cannot be insisted to lead the negative evidence; Accused was acquitted.

Supreme Court of India Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice K M Joseph The latest judgement of the supreme court delivered on 9th of April 2019, aft...

Read more

CIVIL LAW: LAND DISPUTE - Onus to prove title of land is on the person who files the case before the court - In certain situations admitted facts are also required to be proved.

By team of Advocate Retainer May 25, 2019 - 03:30

CIVIL LAW: LAND DISPUTE - Onus to prove title of land is on the person who files the case before the court - In certain situations admitted facts are also required to be proved.

Supreme Court of India Justice R Banumathi It was held by the Supreme Court of India in the case titled as 'Jagdish Prasad Patel Versus Shivna...

Read more

CORPORATE LAWYER: EXCISE DUTY (GST) - 'Dharmade' paid voluntarily by customers cannot be added for the purpose of calculating excise duty. Order of CESAT set aside. Earlier decision of SC in Panchmukhi held to be not a good law.

By team of Advocate Retainer May 24, 2019 - 14:00

CORPORATE LAWYER: EXCISE DUTY (GST) - 'Dharmade' paid voluntarily by customers cannot be added for the purpose of calculating excise duty. Order of CESAT set aside. Earlier decision of SC in Panchmukhi held to be not a good law.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA BENCH : Three Judges It is in vogue that the purchaser of highly excisable goods are paying apart from consideration for the...

Read more

CORPORATE LAWYER: TENDER MATTERS - Supreme Court held show cause for blacklisting proceedings - does not tantamount to pendency of blacklisting proceedings. The contract restored to the successful bidder for tender.

By team of Advocate Retainer May 24, 2019 - 09:00

CORPORATE LAWYER: TENDER MATTERS - Supreme Court held show cause for blacklisting proceedings - does not tantamount to pendency of blacklisting proceedings. The contract restored to the successful bidder for tender.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Sanjay Kishan Kaul (J) & S.A Bobde (J) It is not uncommon that the unsuccessful bidders in tender are challenging the te...

Read more